Landmark HIFI Study Publication Demonstrates Positive Outcomes with Focal One® Robotic HIFU Versus Surgery in the Management of Prostate Cancer
EDAP 12.04.2024
Drug:Focal-One Focal One
Diseases:localized prostate cancer

About Gravity Analytica
HIFI Study is the largest (N = 3,328) prospective, comparative, multi-center clinical study ever conducted comparing prostate cancer treatments
Positive study results are expected to drive further adoption of Focal One as a first line treatment option for the management of localized prostate cancer
Study shows Focal One Robotic HIFU is non-inferior to surgery, meeting primary endpoint of non-inferiority for Salvage Treatment-free Survival (STFS) after High Intensity Focused Ultrasounds (HIFU) compared to Radical Prostatectomy (RP) at 30 months
Study shows that patients receiving HIFU had better outcomes with respect to urinary continence and erectile function compared to patients receiving RP
“The publication of the HIFI study inEuropean Urologywill importantly serve to increase awareness amongst the global urology and patient community on how robotic HIFU technology is rapidly changing the treatment paradigm for patients with localized, early-stage prostate cancer,” said Professor
“We are pleased to announce the publication of the HIFI study results in the prestigious medical journal,European Urology,” said
HIFI is the first prospective, multi-center, non-inferiority comparative study evaluating HIFU and RP in the management of localized prostate cancer. This seven-year study (
Clinical Data Highlights:
At 30 months, the adjusted STFS was higher in the HIFU arm (90%) compared with RP arm (86%)
The propensity score-adjusted result is similar to the univariate result (HR=0.71 [95%CI, 0.52-0.97], p=0.008). After adjustment on different variables (Age, BMI, ASA score,
Grade Group , prostate volume, PSA): the risk of salvage treatment is lower in the HIFU arm compared to RP. This result remains true when analyzing the subgroup with intermediate risk (HR=0.66 [95%CI, 0.50-0.86], p=0.001).International Continence Society (ICS) score, a measure of stress urinary incontinence was significantly less deteriorated for HIFU (29%) vs, RP (44%) (RR=0.66 [95%CI, 0.59-0.74], p<0.001) for all ages combined.International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5), a well validated measurement of erectile function, decreased significantly less after HIFU than after RP with a drop in difference in medians from -9 (-10;-7.7) to -3.0 (-3.9; -2.1) between both groups, for all ages included.
Post-procedural benefits of HIFU on both erectile function and urinary continence were demonstrated despite patients in the HIFU-treated group being an average of 9.6 years older (median age was 74.7 years for HIFU vs 65.1 years for RP, p<0.001)
AboutEuropean Urology
European Urologyis the official journal of the
About
Forward-Looking StatementsIn addition to historical information, this press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, including Section 27A of the
Other factors that may cause such a difference may also include, but are not limited to, those described in the Company's filings with the
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made. Other than required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to update them in light of new information or future developments. These forward-looking statements are based upon information, assumptions and estimates available to us as of the date of this press release, and while we believe such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be limited or incomplete.
Company Contact
Investor Contact
Source: EDAP TMS S.A.